Healthcare · A practical reflection guide
How to evaluate your accessibility culture
Examine what your organization repeatedly prioritizes, supports, and does—not just what its policies say.
Working guidance, not a validated assessment. These six review areas are practical organizing prompts, not a claim that they are the study’s validated constructs or scales. Do not use the descriptions to certify conformance, rank organizations, or produce an ACLT score. Culture review complements technical accessibility testing; it does not establish WCAG or legal compliance.
Run an evidence-informed conversation
- Define the scope. Choose a patient or workforce journey, such as finding care, scheduling an appointment, using a portal, or reading follow-up instructions. Name the teams, systems, and time period covered. Start with a manageable scope rather than claiming to evaluate the whole organization.
- Bring different perspectives. Include a decision maker, people doing the work, accessibility expertise, and people affected by barriers. Offer accessible formats, more than one way to contribute, and appropriate support for participation.
- Gather examples before judging. Combine conversations, work artifacts, and observed practice. A policy shows an intention; examples show whether it is used. As a practical starting point, seek two recent examples where feasible, without treating that as a validation threshold.
- Discuss the six areas. Record what supports each judgment and any disagreement. Separate missing evidence from evidence that a practice is absent. Look for counterexamples and exceptions.
- Choose one or two changes. Identify who can act, what support they need, what evidence would show progress, and when you will review it together.
Privacy: Use approved organizational processes. Record de-identified patterns and document references rather than student records, patient information, personnel details, or identifiable accounts of disability.
Describe practice without inventing a score
Select the description best supported by evidence within the scope you reviewed. Different areas may have different descriptions. Do not average them. A small pilot cannot establish an organization-wide pattern.
| Description | What it means |
|---|---|
| Unclear | Evidence is missing, conflicting, or too limited to judge. Record what you need to learn. |
| Person-dependent | The practice happens mainly through individual effort, exceptions, or reminders. |
| Defined & supported | Ownership, expectations, resources, and a repeatable process are documented and used in the reviewed scope. |
| Embedded & learning | Multiple examples over time show the practice continuing across people and teams, with feedback shaping improvements. |
Worksheet: Notes entered below stay on this page only and are not saved or submitted. Print or save as PDF before leaving. Avoid confidential information.
Review area 1
Leadership & purpose
Ask together
Can leaders connect digital accessibility to participation in care and show how it influences priorities and resources?
Look for evidence
Service plans, leadership decisions, digital investment records, and interviews with patient experience and operational teams.
A sign of culture in practice
A leader prioritizes an inaccessible scheduling step because it prevents patients from completing a service journey.
Review area 2
Governance & decision authority
Ask together
Who can address barriers across portals, communications, clinical operations, procurement, and vendors?
Look for evidence
Decision rights, purchasing criteria, escalation pathways, vendor issue ownership, and cross-team decision records.
A sign of culture in practice
A portal barrier has a responsible owner who can coordinate with the vendor and the teams supporting patients.
Review area 3
Everyday practice & accountability
Ask together
Are accessibility expectations built into digital content, scheduling, forms, telehealth, and follow-up workflows?
Look for evidence
Sampled communications, document templates, content reviews, service workflows, and issue-management records.
A sign of culture in practice
Appointment instructions use a consistent accessible template as part of routine publishing.
Review area 4
Learning & capability
Ask together
Do staff who create or select digital services have practical, role-specific skills and support?
Look for evidence
Training examples, onboarding, communications guidance, vendor review support, and work samples showing application.
A sign of culture in practice
A communications team knows how to prepare accessible follow-up materials and where to escalate a platform limitation.
Review area 5
Participation & belonging
Ask together
Can patients and staff with disabilities contribute to improvement through accessible, privacy-conscious routes?
Look for evidence
Approved feedback and participation processes, de-identified research summaries, and decisions influenced by participants.
A sign of culture in practice
A de-identified pattern from patient feedback informs a portal workflow improvement without exposing patient records.
Review area 6
Feedback & continuous improvement
Ask together
Are recurring access barriers reviewed across the whole journey, including handoffs between systems?
Look for evidence
De-identified feedback trends, recurring issue analysis, cross-team reviews, assigned improvements, and follow-up evidence.
A sign of culture in practice
A problem spanning reminders and scheduling leads to a coordinated workflow change and a later check of the experience.
Turn the review into a practical next step
Choose a recurring barrier or organizational condition that matters to people affected and that your team can influence. Consider impact, repetition, decision authority, and the support required. Avoid choosing only the easiest item or only the area with the least documentation.
- Name the finding: “Within this journey, we observed… supported by… with these uncertainties…”
- Name the change: Specify one decision or recurring practice to improve.
- Assign authority and support: Agree an owner, decision maker, time, resources, and a route for escalation.
- Define evidence of progress: Identify what would show changed practice and an improved experience, alongside any relevant technical checks.
- Set a review date: Revisit in 30–90 days, using the same scope where possible. Ask what changed, what did not, and what you learned.
Keep a short record of the scope, participants’ roles, evidence dates, findings, differing views, priorities, owners, and review date. Share an accessible summary with participants and invite corrections.
Discuss your findings
These guides are starting points for organizational reflection and improvement. For questions about applying the approach in healthcare, contact Dr. Deb.